Healthline is owned by media giant company Red Ventures, which has a whole RVO Health subdivision comprising many domains in this YMYL niche. One of them is also Medical News Today that you can see among the biggest players listed in the chart above. All of these websites are SEO powerhouses we can learn from, but I found Healthline to be the most interesting one, especially its content and on-page aspects. Let’s take a look at five insights that stood out to me from many hours of analysis. 1. Ticket Affiliate You can perfectly align with search intent using templates It’s hardly a surprise that you’ll find patterns after publishing tens of thousands of pieces of content.
In Healthline’s case
It currently has around 34K pages in its Health and Nutrition. Article subfolders that drive the vast majority of its traffic. But more often than not, you’ll need. Some more unique executive email list points and headings to align perfectly with the search intent. For example, here are three SERP snippets that use the same title tag template that tells you the focus of the article. We have crackling in ear… All of these articles have huge structural overlaps but are still unique in one way or another, which makes them great for answering all sorts of questions a searcher may have. Healthline uses the title template of {health problem} followed by the most relevant combination of words like causes, symptoms, treatment, diagnosis, risks, preventions, pictures, etc., across the board. It sounds simple.
Ticket Affiliate the right
Combination that best aligns with the search intent results in. SERP titles that are better—or at least on par with the. Competition: Nailing search intent alignment DT Leads is one thing. But being able to do it with multiple pieces of content that have. Huge target keyword overlaps is an advanced SEO and content game. I think most people associate ranking for one keyword using multiple pieces of. Content with a phenomenon that hurts one or more of these pages. This is known as keyword cannibalization. But take a look at this. As someone who’s done a bit of research about creatine in the past. I can see myself clicking on both of these results.
